Mai Hontama vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Apr at 05:47 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hontama vs M. Inglis

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hontama 2 - 0 Inglis
They have played 4 sets in total, with Mai Hontama winning 4 and Maddison Inglis winning 0. The last match between Mai Hontama and Maddison Inglis was at the W100 Gifu, 30-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mai Hontama getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hontama | 2 |
| Inglis | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Gifu(04-30-25)
(R2) W50 Corroios-Seixal(07-11-24)
M. Hontama vs M. Inglis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $635,248 | Career Prize Money | $628,555 |
| 58.10% (287-207) | Career Total W/L | 58.81% (307-215) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 9 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-6) |
M. Hontama vs M. Inglis Match Preview:
Analyzing the recent performance of Inglis and Hontama, we see distinct variations in their second serve success rates. Inglis has captured 41.79% of points on their second serve in the last six months, while Hontama has managed a slightly lower figure of 39.86%. This statistic is often a strong indicator of match outcomes, offering insights into likely success for either player.
When considering return games, Hontama has demonstrated a stronger performance in recent form, capturing 50.89% of points on the opponent's second serve, compared to Inglis' 46.5%. For first serve returns, Hontama's success rate stands at 33.94%, exceeding Inglis' 30.07%. This data holds significant weight in determining the likely victor in their head-to-head clashes.
Assessing performances under pressure highlights Inglis' ability to save 49.23% of breakpoints, showing superior resilience compared to Hontama’s 42.42%. When it comes to converting break points, Hontama leads with a 38.97% conversion rate versus Inglis’ 33.33%, a critical stat for predicting game shifts during play.
Over the past year, Inglis has a win-loss record of 47-27, translating to a win percentage of 63.51%. In contrast, Hontama has won 42.37% of her matches, with a record of 25-34. These figures provide a broad perspective on their relative dominance over the past twelve months.
Surface performance analysis reveals that both players favor hard courts. Inglis boasts a career win rate of 62% on this surface, closely matched by Hontama's 61%. However, their weakest surfaces diverge, with Inglis struggling on indoor hard (0%), and Hontama being less successful on grass (50%).
In the realm of competitive environments, Inglis has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, enjoying a higher win rate of 66.67%. Hontama, involved in similar level tournaments, holds a win rate of 42.42%. These statistics underline Inglis' stronger performance at these event levels.
Their head-to-head history features a single encounter, which Hontama won convincingly, 6-2, 6-1 at the W 50 Corroios-Seixal on a hard court. This match also averaged a duration of 1 hour and 8 minutes, offering some context for expectations around match length.
Opponent quality further differentiates these players: Inglis' recent opponents have had an average ranking of 281.2, whereas Hontama's competitors have been ranked higher, for an average of 250.15. This suggests that Hontama has been facing tougher competition.
In deciding sets against all players, both Inglis and Hontama have an identical success rate of 45% over the last year. This information is crucial for live predictions, particularly in close matches that extend to a deciding set.
Based on these statistics, Inglis appears to have a slight edge in overall match and event performance. Therefore, despite past head-to-head outcomes, Inglis could be considered the favorite to win the upcoming matchup, given her recent form and tournament success. The weight of these various statistics suggests a promising prospect for Inglis in their forthcoming contest.
Mai Hontama vs Maddison Inglis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hontama vs M. Inglis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:12:11 | Average Match Time | 1:12:11 |
| 60% (63/105) | 1st Serve % | 52% (48/93) |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (23/48) |
| 60% (25/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 59% (10/17) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 57% (53/93) | Return Points Win % | 35% (37/105) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hontama Recent Matches Played
M. Inglis Recent Matches Played

M. Hontama vs M. Inglis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.10% (287/207) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.81% (307/215) |
| 56.94% (640/484) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.56% (689/508) |
| 53.27% (5410/4746) | Games Win/Loss | 53.07% (5774/5105) |
| 59.61% (214/145) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.74% (246/159) |
| 53.57% (30/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.81% (22/25) |
| 56.25% (36/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.32% (35/24) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 205 | Aces Total | 845 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1435 | Total Double Faults | 1427 |
| 1:31:52 | Average Match Time | 1:28:19 |
| 429.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 464.72 |
| 67% (20172/30109) | 1st Serve % | 65% (19236/29602) |
| 59% (11817/20172) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12112/19236) |
| 45% (4501/9923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4848/10366) |
| 50% (2091/4199) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1758/3698) |
| 48% (14816/30616) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13792/30772) |
| 48.48% (16/17) | Slam W/L | 43.90% (18/23) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Masters W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 80.00% (8/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.62% (30/33) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (24/32) |
| 59.39% (196/134) | Challenger W/L | 63.07% (251/147) |
| 70.00% (28/12) | Futures W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 58% (284/486) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (302/509) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 51% (48/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (65/101) |
| 52% (74/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (84/160) |
| 87% (280/244) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (301/258) |
| 13% (280/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (301/43) |
| 20% (214/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (221/50) |